Project Executive Summary
AI-Assisted Documentation
ABHAVTECH SD-ACCESS PROJECT - EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Cost Breakdown by Category
| Category |
Item |
Mumbai |
Chennai |
Noida |
Global |
Total Quantity |
Unit Cost ($) |
Total Cost ($) |
Annual OpEx ($) |
Notes |
| Fabric Infrastructure |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Border Nodes |
C9500-24Y4C |
2 |
2 |
Integrated in FIAB |
0 |
4 |
$X,XXX |
$X,XXX |
$X,XXX |
External connectivity + VRF routing |
| Control Plane Nodes |
C9500-24Y4C |
2 |
2 |
Integrated in FIAB |
0 |
4 |
$X,XXX |
$X,XXX |
$X,XXX |
LISP Map-Server/Map-Resolver |
| Intermediate Nodes |
C9500-24Y4C |
2 |
2 |
0 |
0 |
4 |
$X,XXX |
$X,XXX |
$X,XXX |
Aggregation layer (only Mumbai/Chennai) |
| Edge Switches |
C9300-48U |
48 |
54 |
4 |
0 |
106 |
$X,XXX |
$X,XXX |
$X,XXX |
Access layer for users |
| FIAB Core |
C9300-48UXM |
0 |
0 |
2 |
0 |
2 |
$X,XXX |
$X,XXX |
$X,XXX |
Noida branch collapsed design |
| Access Switches |
C9200-48P |
0 |
0 |
4 |
0 |
4 |
$X,XXX |
$X,XXX |
$X,XXX |
Noida traditional access |
| Wireless Infrastructure |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Wireless LAN Controllers |
C9800-40 |
2 |
2 |
0 |
0 |
4 |
$X,XXX |
$X,XXX |
$X,XXX |
Centralized wireless management |
| Embedded WLC |
EWC License |
0 |
0 |
2 |
0 |
2 |
$X,XXX |
$X,XXX |
$X,XXX |
Included in C9300-48UXM DNA license |
| Indoor Access Points |
C9130AXI |
342 |
170 |
20 |
0 |
532 |
$X,XXX |
$X,XXX |
$X,XXX |
Wi-Fi 6E enterprise APs |
| Outdoor Access Points |
C9164I-E |
58 |
30 |
0 |
0 |
88 |
$X,XXX |
$X,XXX |
$X,XXX |
Outdoor hardened APs |
| Security Infrastructure |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Firewalls |
FTD 4150 |
3 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
3 |
$X,XXX |
$X,XXX |
$X,XXX |
Mumbai DIA (2) + MPLS (1) |
| Firewalls |
FTD 2130 |
0 |
2 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
$X,XXX |
$X,XXX |
$X,XXX |
Chennai HA pair |
| Firewalls |
FTD 1150 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
0 |
2 |
$X,XXX |
$X,XXX |
$X,XXX |
Noida branch HA pair |
| Firewall Management |
FMC Virtual |
1 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
$X,XXX |
$X,XXX |
$X,XXX |
Centralized firewall management |
| ISE Primary PAN |
SNS-3695 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
$X,XXX |
$X,XXX |
$X,XXX |
Policy Admin Node (Mumbai) |
| ISE Secondary PAN |
SNS-3695 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
$X,XXX |
$X,XXX |
$X,XXX |
Secondary PAN (Chennai) |
| ISE PSN Nodes |
SNS-3655 |
2 |
2 |
0 |
0 |
4 |
$X,XXX |
$X,XXX |
$X,XXX |
Policy Service Nodes (RADIUS) |
| ISE MnT Nodes |
SNS-3655 |
1 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
$X,XXX |
$X,XXX |
$X,XXX |
Monitoring & Logging |
| DDI Infrastructure |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| DNS/DHCP/IPAM |
Infoblox IB-1420 |
2 |
2 |
0 |
0 |
4 |
$X,XXX |
$X,XXX |
$X,XXX |
Integrated DDI appliances |
| NTP Servers |
Meinberg M1000 |
2 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
$X,XXX |
$X,XXX |
$X,XXX |
GPS-disciplined Stratum 2 |
| NTP Servers |
Meinberg M300 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
$X,XXX |
$X,XXX |
$X,XXX |
Chennai Stratum 3 |
| Management & Orchestration |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| DNAC Cluster Primary |
DN2-HW-APL-XL |
0 |
0 |
0 |
3 |
3 |
$X,XXX |
$X,XXX |
$X,XXX |
New Jersey primary cluster |
| DNAC Cluster DR |
DN2-HW-APL-XL |
0 |
0 |
0 |
3 |
3 |
$X,XXX |
$X,XXX |
$X,XXX |
London DR cluster |
| Monitoring & Backup |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Syslog Server |
Linux VM |
1 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
$X,XXX |
$X,XXX |
$X,XXX |
Centralized logging |
| NetFlow Collector |
Cisco Stealthwatch |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
$X,XXX |
$X,XXX |
$X,XXX |
Traffic analytics |
| SNMP Monitoring |
PRTG Network Monitor |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
$X,XXX |
$X,XXX |
$X,XXX |
Device health monitoring |
| Backup Appliance |
NetBackup |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
$X,XXX |
$X,XXX |
$X,XXX |
DNAC/ISE backup target |
| RANCID Config Backup |
Open Source |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
$X,XXX |
$X,XXX |
$X,XXX |
Redundant config backup |
| ISE Backup SFTP |
Linux VM |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
$X,XXX |
$X,XXX |
$X,XXX |
ISE backup repository |
| Load Balancing |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ISE PSN Load Balancer |
F5 BIG-IP VE |
1 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
$X,XXX |
$X,XXX |
$X,XXX |
RADIUS load balancing |
| Automation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Ansible Tower |
Software License |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
$X,XXX |
$X,XXX |
$X,XXX |
Network automation platform |
| Licensing |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| DNA Advantage (3-year) |
Per Device |
638 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
638 |
$X,XXX |
$X,XXX |
$X,XXX |
SD-Access + Assurance features |
| ISE Plus (3-year) |
Per Endpoint |
18000 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
18000 |
$X,XXX |
$X,XXX |
$X,XXX |
TrustSec + Profiling + Posture |
| Firewall Subscriptions |
Per Appliance |
3 |
2 |
2 |
0 |
7 |
$X,XXX |
$X,XXX |
$X,XXX |
IPS + URL + Malware (annual) |
| Professional Services |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Design & Planning |
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
$X,XXX |
$X,XXX |
$X,XXX |
Architecture design (2 weeks) |
| Implementation |
Mumbai |
|
|
|
|
1 |
$X,XXX |
$X,XXX |
$X,XXX |
Deployment + integration (6 weeks) |
| Implementation |
Chennai |
|
|
|
|
1 |
$X,XXX |
$X,XXX |
$X,XXX |
Deployment (4 weeks) |
| Implementation |
Noida |
|
|
|
|
1 |
$X,XXX |
$X,XXX |
$X,XXX |
Branch deployment (1 week) |
| Training |
Admin Training |
|
|
|
|
1 |
$X,XXX |
$X,XXX |
$X,XXX |
DNAC + ISE training (1 week) |
| Support Contract |
TAC 24x7 |
|
|
|
|
1 |
$X,XXX |
$X,XXX |
$X,XXX |
Cisco TAC support (annual) |
| Contingency |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Contingency |
10% Buffer |
|
|
|
|
1 |
$X,XXX |
$X,XXX |
$X,XXX |
Unforeseen costs & changes |
| Totals |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Total Infrastructure CapEx |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$X,XXX |
|
Hardware + appliances |
|
| Total Licensing (3-year) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$X,XXX |
|
Amortized over $X,XXX years |
|
| Total Services (One-time) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$X,XXX |
|
Design + implementation + training |
|
| Total Contingency |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$X,XXX |
|
$X,XXX% buffer |
|
| GRAND TOTAL CapEx |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$X,XXX |
|
One-time investment |
|
| GRAND TOTAL Annual OpEx |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$X,XXX |
|
Recurring per year |
|
| 3-Year TCO |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$X,XXX |
|
Total Cost of Ownership |
|
Project Timeline
| Phase |
Activity |
Duration (Weeks) |
Start |
End |
Dependencies |
Milestones |
Resources Required |
Risk Level |
| Phase 0 |
Design & Planning |
4 |
Week 1 |
Week 4 |
None |
Design approval + BoM finalized |
2 architects + 1 PM |
Low |
| Phase 1 |
Hardware Procurement |
8 |
Week 5 |
Week 12 |
Phase 0 complete |
All equipment received |
Procurement team |
Medium (supply chain) |
| Phase 2 |
DNAC Deployment |
3 |
Week 13 |
Week 15 |
Hardware received |
DNAC cluster operational |
2 engineers |
Low |
| Phase 3 |
ISE Deployment |
3 |
Week 16 |
Week 18 |
DNAC ready |
ISE PAN + PSN operational |
2 engineers |
Medium |
| Phase 4 |
Mumbai Fabric Build |
6 |
Week 19 |
Week 24 |
ISE ready |
Mumbai fabric live |
4 engineers |
High |
| Phase 5 |
Chennai Fabric Build |
4 |
Week 25 |
Week 28 |
Mumbai complete |
Chennai fabric live |
3 engineers |
Medium |
| Phase 6 |
Noida Branch Deployment |
2 |
Week 29 |
Week 30 |
Chennai complete |
Noida FIAB live |
2 engineers |
Low |
| Phase 7 |
Firewall Integration |
2 |
Week 31 |
Week 32 |
All sites live |
Security policies active |
2 security engineers |
Medium |
| Phase 8 |
Monitoring & Automation |
2 |
Week 33 |
Week 34 |
Firewall done |
Full visibility achieved |
2 engineers |
Low |
| Phase 9 |
User Acceptance Testing |
2 |
Week 35 |
Week 36 |
All systems integrated |
UAT sign-off |
4 engineers + users |
Medium |
| Phase 10 |
Training & Handover |
2 |
Week 37 |
Week 38 |
UAT complete |
Project closure |
2 trainers |
Low |
| Total Project Duration |
38 weeks |
|
|
Week 1 |
Week 38 |
Go-live: Week 36 |
10-15 engineers peak |
|
Risk Assessment
| Risk ID |
Risk Description |
Probability |
Impact |
Mitigation Strategy |
Owner |
Status |
| R001 |
Hardware delivery delays |
Medium |
High |
Order 4 weeks early + backup vendors |
Procurement |
Open |
| R002 |
DNAC cluster sizing insufficient |
Low |
Critical |
Validate with Cisco TAC pre-purchase |
Architect |
Closed |
| R003 |
ISE integration issues |
Medium |
High |
Engage Cisco PSS for ISE deployment |
Project Manager |
Open |
| R004 |
Fabric underlay misconfiguration |
High |
Critical |
Deploy test lab first + peer review configs |
Lead Engineer |
Open |
| R005 |
WAN latency to DNAC (APAC) |
Medium |
Medium |
Implement regional DNAC in Year 2 if needed |
Architect |
Accepted |
| R006 |
Firewall throughput bottleneck |
Low |
High |
Size FTD 4150 with 2.5× headroom |
Security Engineer |
Closed |
| R007 |
Budget overrun |
Medium |
High |
10% contingency buffer + monthly tracking |
PM + Finance |
Open |
| R008 |
Skill gap (SD-Access expertise) |
High |
Medium |
External consultants + Cisco training |
HR + PM |
Mitigated |
| R009 |
Change management resistance |
Medium |
Medium |
User training + phased rollout |
Change Manager |
Open |
| R010 |
Vendor lock-in (Cisco) |
Low |
Medium |
Document open APIs + automation via Ansible |
Architect |
Accepted |
Resource Requirements
| Role |
Quantity |
Duration (Weeks) |
Hourly Rate ($) |
Total Cost ($) |
Responsibility |
Required Skills |
Notes |
| Network Architect |
2 |
38 |
$X,XXX |
$X,XXX |
Overall design + validation |
CCIE/CCDE + SD-Access |
Lead technical decisions |
| Project Manager |
1 |
38 |
$X,XXX |
$X,XXX |
Timeline + budget + risk |
PMP + IT experience |
Single point of contact |
| Network Engineer |
4 |
30 |
$X,XXX |
$X,XXX |
Implementation + config |
CCNP + SD-Access training |
Hands-on deployment |
| Security Engineer |
2 |
10 |
$X,XXX |
$X,XXX |
Firewall + ISE policies |
CCNP Security |
Firewall + TrustSec focus |
| Wireless Engineer |
2 |
8 |
$X,XXX |
$X,XXX |
WLC + AP deployment |
CCNP Wireless |
Wi-Fi 6E expertise |
| QA/Test Engineer |
2 |
6 |
$X,XXX |
$X,XXX |
UAT + validation |
CCNA + test scripts |
Pre-production testing |
| Trainer |
1 |
2 |
$X,XXX |
$X,XXX |
Admin training |
CCNA + teaching exp |
Knowledge transfer |
| Total Professional Services |
|
|
|
|
$X,XXX |
|
External consultants if needed |
Capacity Headroom Analysis
| Component |
Current Load |
Platform Capacity |
Utilization % |
3-Year Projected |
3-Year Utilization % |
Headroom Remaining |
Upgrade Trigger |
Notes |
| DNAC Devices |
638 |
8000 |
8% |
1500 |
19% |
81% |
>60% utilization |
Well-sized for growth |
| ISE Endpoints |
18000 |
25000 |
72% |
30000 |
120% |
OVER CAPACITY |
Upgrade to 50K license at Year 2 |
Action required |
| Border Throughput |
28 Gbps |
440 Gbps |
6.4% |
45 Gbps |
10.2% |
89.8% |
>50% utilization |
Excellent headroom |
| WLC APs |
532 |
2000 |
27% |
750 |
38% |
62% |
>70% utilization |
Good capacity |
| Firewall (Mumbai) |
18 Gbps |
70 Gbps |
26% |
28 Gbps |
40% |
60% |
>60% utilization |
Well-sized |
| Edge Ports |
5400 |
6912 |
78% |
6500 |
94% |
6% |
Add edge stacks at Year 1 |
Monitor growth closely |
Key Design Decisions
| Decision |
Options Considered |
Selected Option |
Rationale |
Trade-offs |
Approval Date |
Approver |
| Centralized vs Distributed DNAC |
Centralized (NJ) vs Regional (3 sites) |
Centralized |
Cost savings ($X,XXX over 5 years) + adequate for stable ops |
200ms latency to APAC tolerable |
2026-01-15 |
CTO |
| Collapse Border+CP? |
Separate vs Collapsed |
Keep Separate |
Security + scalability + standard design |
Cost $X,XXX more per site |
2026-01-18 |
Network Architect |
| Intermediate Nodes Needed? |
Yes vs No |
YES (Mumbai/Chennai) |
48 edges > CP port capacity |
Add $X,XXX cost |
2026-01-20 |
Network Architect |
| Firewall Platform |
FTD vs ASA vs Palo Alto |
Cisco FTD |
SD-Access SGT integration + Cisco ecosystem |
Vendor lock-in |
2026-01-22 |
Security Architect |
| WLC Placement |
Centralized vs Embedded |
Centralized (hubs) + EWC (branches) |
Performance + features vs cost optimization |
Hubs get full features |
2026-01-25 |
Wireless Architect |
| ISE PSN Load Balancer? |
F5 vs HAProxy vs ISE Node Groups |
F5 BIG-IP VE |
Enterprise support + proven |
Cost $X,XXX |
2026-01-28 |
Security Architect |
| QoS Strategy |
Trust DSCP vs Re-mark All |
Trust DSCP from endpoints |
Simpler + faster |
Requires endpoint compliance |
2026-01-30 |
Network Architect |