6.8 Risk-Adjusted Projections¶
6.8.1 Sensitivity Analysis¶
+------------------------------------------------------------------+
| SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS |
+------------------------------------------------------------------+
BASE CASE ASSUMPTIONS:
- Implementation timeline: 40 weeks
- Benefit realization: 100% by Year 2
- No scope changes
- No additional hardware required
SCENARIO ANALYSIS:
Pessimistic Base Case Optimistic
------------------------------------------------------------------
Timeline Extension +25% (50 wks) 40 weeks -10% (36 wks)
Benefit Realization 75% 100% 110%
Hardware Contingency +15% 0% -5%
Labor Cost Variance +20% 0% -10%
5-YEAR NPV IMPACT:
Pessimistic Base Case Optimistic
------------------------------------------------------------------
Timeline Only -$X,XXX $X,XXX +$X,XXXenefits Only -$X,XXX $X,XXX +$X,XXXHardware Only -$X,XXX $X,XXX +$X,XXXLabor Only -$X,XXX $X,XXX +$X,XXXCombined -$X,XXX $X,XXX +$X,XXX
RISK-ADJUSTED NPV RANGE:
Best Case: +$X,XXXExpected (Base): $X,XXXWorst Case: -$X,XXX==================================================================
6.8.2 Risk Contingency Budget¶
| Risk Category | Probability | Impact | Contingency |
|---|---|---|---|
| Schedule delay | 30% | $X,XXX | $X,XXX |
| Hardware issues | 20% | $X,XXX | $X,XXX |
| Integration complexity | 25% | $X,XXX | $X,XXX |
| Resource availability | 15% | $X,XXX | $X,XXX |
| Scope creep | 20% | $X,XXX | $X,XXX |
| Total Contingency | $X,XXX |
Recommended Contingency Reserve: $X,XXX(7.5% of CapEx)